…as many of us know has been hiding in plain sight. Nowhere has the indoctrination of the masses been more evident (and rigorously enforced) than in the area of vaccines. Even the scientific genius of Jimmy Kimmel has been applied to the effort.  And the clarion of “no scientific proof” continues to sound and is blown in the ears of those who otherwise claim that kids injected 72 times between birth and high school graduation might actually be affected in negative ways.  Now we have a bit of a study that demands some explanation on the part of the Vaxxers… A study just published in the Journal of Translational Science seems to strongly indicate that there is indeed a dark downside to the current vaccine schedules with respect to everything from infections and allergies (of many types) to neurodevelopmental disorders (such as autism, attention disorders, learning disabilities, etc).  And the so-called “odds ratios” are major and statistically significant.  The very conservative conclusions would seem reasonable:

Although the cross-sectional design of the study limits causal interpretation, the strength and consistency of the findings, the apparent “dose-response” relationship between vaccination status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association between vaccination and NDDs (Neurological Developmental Disorders) all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity. Vaccination also remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors, whereas preterm birth, long considered a major risk factor for NDD, was not associated with NDD after controlling for the interaction between preterm birth and vaccination. In addition, preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD above that of vaccination alone. Nevertheless, the study findings should be interpreted with caution. First, additional research is needed to replicate the findings in studies with larger samples and stronger research designs. Second, subject to replication, potentially detrimental factors associated with the vaccination schedule should be identified and addressed and underlying mechanisms better understood. Such studies are essential in order to optimize the impact of vaccination of children’s health.

This should be alarming to just about everyone but particularly to the parents of children who are already exhibiting signs and symptoms of developmental, learning, motor, and immune function abnormalities.  This would include those in the parade coming and going to pediatric appointments for the constant ear infections, food allergies, asthma, rashes, and other mysterious illnesses that have become all too common.  The likelihood of these occurring has gone up exponentially, and it is no longer a big mystery to some — even though voicing that opinion is treated like sedition.

One does wonder why in the “greatest healthcare system in the world” we have:

  • 1 child in 6 learning disabled; 23
  • 1 in 9 with asthma; 24
  • 1 in 10 diagnosed with a mental disorder; 25
  • 1 in 13 severely allergic to food; 26
  • 1 in 20 epileptic; 27
  • 1 in 50 developing autism; 28
  • 1 in 400 with diabetes 29

Type 1 diabetes alone continues to rise — like inflation — by 3% per year.  That is the INCIDENCE, not the absolute numbers.  This all started in the middle of the 20th century and correlates almost perfectly with the advent of childhood vaccinations.  Prior to that, the disease was relatively rare — estimated at < 1 in 2000 births or less.

These data are not disputed — the references come from a presentation earlier this year in Washington, DC, where Barbara Loe Fisher (National Vaccine Information Center) demanded answers.  The lamestream media not only has not covered this, but they continue to indoctrinate the masses.  And the current president — whether you like him or not — feels that the vaccine industry needs to answer for themselves.  I wonder where some of those dollars are coming from that want to get rid of him.

2 Comments on A smoking gun…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *