There is a major battle brewing on the horizon between the Vaccine Believers and those who actually understand what the human immune system can do once recovered from an infection.  The former will attempt to force, shame, mandate, and even segregate those who are not vaccinated to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, aka, “COVID.”  Why?  The truth is buried in plain sight underneath the veil of political control and the natural human tendency to force the “be like us” collective mentality on everyone.  But a closer look at claims that the vaccine confers “superior immunity” reveals a level of “herd ignorance” that is simply astonishing.

A recent paper published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases appears to confirm that “immunological memory is acquired in most individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and is sustained in a majority of patients for up to 11 months after recovery.”  If that were not enough proof, we now have a study from the Washington School of Medicine in St Louis validating that fact and further claiming that immunity may last minimally 17 years.

Long-lived bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs) are a persistent and essential source of protective antibodies.  Individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 have a substantially lower risk of reinfection with SARS-CoV-28–10. Nonetheless, it has been reported that levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies decrease rapidly in the first few months after infection, raising concerns that long-lived BMPCs may not be generated and humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 may be short-lived11–13. Here we show that in convalescent individuals who had experienced mild SARS-CoV-2 infections (n = 77), levels of serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibodies declined rapidly in the frst 4 months after infection and then more gradually over the following 7 months, remaining detectable at least 11 months after infection. Anti-S antibody titres correlated with the frequency of S-specifc plasma cells in bone marrow aspirates from 18 individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 at 7 to 8 months after infection.  S-specifc BMPCs were not detected in aspirates from 11 healthy individuals with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We show that S-binding BMPCs are quiescent, which suggests that they are part of a stable compartment. Consistently, circulating resting memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 S were detected in the convalescent individuals. Overall, our results indicate that mild infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces robust antigen-specifc, long-lived humoral immune memory in humans.

There is zero — yes ZERO — evidence that any vaccine for the COVID 19 virus does this.  So claims that previously infected individuals must get this vaccine — and expose themselves to major risks that are still being defined — are not only ignorant but dangerous.  “Informed consent” MUST be rendered for any medical intervention not otherwise chosen by the individual based on international ethical standards established after WWII and the Nuremberg Convention in 1947.  It begins with this unequivocal statement:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

I would recommend that this be read carefully and compared with the whimsical, uninformed, baseless, and dangerous mandates being currently circulated by governments, corporations, sporting venues, and healthcare “providers” who rarely detail the known risks with any accuracy and NEVER proffer that many of the risks are completely UNKNOWN…and will remain unknown for years.

So, minimally, if any individual either has a medical contraindication to the vaccine — chronic inflammatory conditions, active autoimmune disease, etc — or demonstrable natural or acquired immunity, they should not get the vaccine nor be coerced in to getting it.  This is not debatable any longer from either a scientific or ethical standpoint.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *